Light Meter Reviews – Simple Old School Single Purpose Light Metering

Posted: August 4, 2014 in Light Meters, Reviewed - Good Performers
Tags: , , , , , , ,

This is going to be a quick one. First of all, no matter what other meters one might own, the basic illuminance meter, with its readout in Lux or Fc remains an essential. You pull it out, press a button, get a number. The issue is with the latest generation of LED fixtures and retrofit lamps. They present a somewhat skewed spectral balance that can cause issues with older meters. For example, my trusty old (very very old) Minolta Color Meter II shows all LED sources as being roughly 200 CCT cooler than they actually are, sometimes, sometimes not. My other old trusty bag filler is a Minolta T-1H, which is great under daylight and tungsten sources, but not so good under LEDs, where  readings are off about 12% most of the time, and when exposed to LEDs with any flicker in them – the meter has a hard time finding a reading to settle on. I also have a Testo 540 digital ligth meter, which is an excellent in-the-pocket device, as it is very slim and includes a cover for the light sensor. At a cost of under $140, they are hard to beat for a simple tag-along meter for general illuminance measurement. The flicker issue was also experienced in a more contemporary Minotla T-10MA and T-10A although to a lesser degree.

Minolta T-10MA - image from Minolta site.

Minolta T-10MA – image from Minolta site.

I used these in lab conditions for collecting photometric data and in the field. Flickering sources simply confounded getting a steady reading.  Under normal LED lights, and all other light sources, these are a great meter, with a ton of options to grid several heads together, remote and mounted head locations, various accessories and add-ons, like AC power, and data downloading, to make these a nice product… however, these neat devices do cost $1,060 for the T-10A, a bit more for the remote head T-10M, plus another $600 for software to connect it and download data via PC. For someone looking for a meter to be calibrated annually, with trustworthy precision, and no need for color analysis, this is about the best package there is, if the budget is available for it.  If you need color capability and greater integration of data collection functions, you will likely find the T-10 expensively redundant, as most color meters produce the same readings as part of their output. The T-10, however, does offer features for field studies of illuminance over an area, specifically the grid connection of several sensor heads over a wide area, that few other meters support at this price level. More on the TM series from Konica Minolta This leads to the one meter I use the most when all I am looking for is a quick “how many foot-candles are here” reading. That’s the AmpProbe LM-200LED.

Amp LM

The AMPProbe LM200LED

This meter provides results in Lx or Fc with a simple button press, has data hold, max level memory, and a range wide enough to cover any lighting need. The remote light sensor head is great for getting ones white shirt out of the readings. At less than $100, this is a particularly hard bargain to beat. I’ve done photo-metric tests with this product and been within 5% of independent professional photo-metric results, and have put it against a wide range of other meters to verify its accuracy and found it to be pretty much spot on, even when tested against meters costing literally hundreds of times more. The meter can take a moment to settle down to a steady reading when exposed to flickering sources, but it will, in the end, stop vacillating and give a reliable result. I suspect the low price comes at the cost of a particularly slow processor, so with that in mind, I just give it some time to get its job done. I’ve been using the meter pictured for 6 years now, with no issues at all. Its battery seems to last forever. It also has a 1/4 x 20 threaded boss in its back to mount the meter body, although I am not sure what utility that serves, since the head has no such provision. I also found it to produce reliable readings under colored light sources. However, under UV light sources, the diffuser over the sensor fluoresces, so the readings  become unreliable at anything below 420nm. One additional feature worth mentioning, is this meter includes the ability to set a zero point by adjusting a pot in the side of the meter body. I used this feature for one customer who ordered 3 meters that needed to produce as near-identical readings as possible  for a quality inspection use. We were able to accomplish this using the adjustment feature. I have also used it to set a dark zero-point in a make-shift lab condition where exclusion of 100% of ambient light was not possible. I have had several other white light meters, some okay, others not. That said, as we have added other meters to our tool box, I find the need for these simpler meters to be less and less. As we will see in future reviews, when a precision light sensing head is added to a smart phone or tablet, their becomes fewer instances where the redundancy of a low cost meter is necessary. More on the AMPROBE LM-200LED

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s